Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Informed Voters

These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of Marital Rape

785 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

No

 @9GZD33M from Iowa  agreed…2yrs2Y

There are so many men out in the world that have been accused of rape and sent to jail with no evidence. Women have a very powerful voice in this generation. It can ruin a man's life within an instant. There should be cases with the two individuals that don't cause the man to go straight to jail right away.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

 @9RHK5N6Alliance from New York  commented…11mos11MO

Not you bringing up the myth that false rape allegations ruin lives when true rape allegations aren’t even doing that.

Hate to burst your little bubble, but false rape accusations RARELY happen. Meanwhile anywhere from 1 in 2 to 1 in 5 women are being raped by men like you.

The fact that you’re THIS concerned about being accused of rape makes me think you’re hiding something.

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

You definitely make a good point, but reducing the severity of the crime isn't the answer. Just make the process to accuse them harder, and require a full court proceeding rather than just the woman saying "My husband raped me!" and the husband getting thrown in jail. I believe that all domestic violence should be punished as severely as nonmarital assault, reducing the severity of violence just because the perpetrator and victim have a relationship isn't right.

 @9KM6ZWF from Washington  agreed…1yr1Y

Many men in the United States have been accused of Rape and are truly innocent. Men can have their own lives ruined just by the accusations and commit suicide because of this

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

Then require more rigorous proof. If the wife fails to produce such evidence, the punishment shouldn't be as high. But if she can give clear evidence, the punishment should be as severe as non-marital.

 @9GYX2F6 from Florida  agreed…2yrs2Y

Forced sex is rape and it is inexcusable not only in the eyes of the government and the public but also inexcusable in the eyes of god

 @9HQV9TL from Ohio  disagreed…1yr1Y

The idea that marital rape does not exist is a notion far beyond old fashioned and outdated. Rape can and does exist in marital households and can happen in any and all situations. Rape cannot be denied by a ring on a finger.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

No, it should be classified as domestic violence

 @9J8BM89Republican  from Wisconsin  disagreed…1yr1Y

Rape is rape. Regardless of your relationship with your partner. There should always be consent in marriage. Boundaries must be respected. It is dehumanizing to reduce marital rape to a domestic violence position just because they are married. Put yourself in the position of the victim. How would you feel your rape is less important than someone else just because you were married?

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…2mos2MO

Domestic violence is still a very serious crime. I am not saying to punish the rape less just because it was marriage, but it should be handled differently. If there is a relationship between the perpetrator and victim, that should affect how it is handled, even if it doesn't reduce the severity of it.

 @9LR88LMProgressive from Indiana  disagreed…1yr1Y

Forcing youself on someone, in a sexual way, should be classified as rape. Even if you are married it does not change the fact that you can rape your partner. marriage does not equal consent.

 @9LVS53HRepublicandisagreed…1yr1Y

Rape is rape, no matter if it wasn't severe or not, it was still rape. So it should be under severe violence.

 @9LXLJ2H from Virginia  disagreed…1yr1Y

It does not matter the marital status of someone, if they are raped, their abuser should be charged the same.

 @599YBF2from California  answered…5yrs5Y

 @59G52LTRepublicanfrom Oklahoma  answered…5yrs5Y

No, it's your fault you married the man

  @CrowWatchingJustice party member from Utah  disagreed…3yrs3Y

You are a civil terrorist.

You’re a threat to the well being of victims.

  @top_mastiffRepublican  from Connecticut  commented…8mos8MO

No, it should be classified as domestic violence

Engaged Social Issues Engaged Marital Rape

Well that's a little extreme, calling people terrorists because they don't share the same opinions as you.

 @93RV8TZ from Maryland  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Sounds about republican

 @B2NH276 from West Virginia  commented…4mos4MO

Not just that this person is disgusting and childish! I guarantee their opinion would change if it was their child who was in this kind of situation or if they were the one who was the victim people like this blame the victim until they are the victim.

 @592WL5Sfrom Pennsylvania  answered…5yrs5Y

 @5BY8M8Wfrom Maine  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes. But in case a married person declines having sex with their spouse, after a set amount of time ( for example 6 months ), the spouse would have the right to file for divorce without having to pay mortgage. Also, in case married person declines having sex with their spouse and this leads to the spouse having extra-marital affairs, this could not be grounds for divorce or legal persecution.

 @9RHK5N6Alliance from New York  commented…11mos11MO

  @top_mastiffRepublican  from Connecticut  disagreed…8mos8MO

No, it should be classified as domestic violence

Engaged Social Issues Engaged Marital Rape

I see. So you think that sex is the only part of a marriage? You sound lustful. I'm sure nobody want's to marry you with that attitude, knowing that if they refuse to fufil YOUR desires they will get cheated on. The desire for sex should not be a driving part of marriage. 1 Thessalonians 4:3-5 "It is God's will that you should be sanctified, that you should avoid sexual immorality, that each of you should learn to control your own body in a way that is holy and honorable". So don't be driven by sexual immortality, and control yourself.

  @CrowWatchingJustice party member from Utah  disagreed…3yrs3Y

Marriages for the sole purpose of sex, without the other parties documented consent, should be considered marriage fraud or, in worse cases, rape. If not those, alimony must be paid along with mortgages

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

The only reason why anyone should want to have sex is to make a baby. Yes, if someone wants a baby, but their spouse doesn't want that should be grounds for a divorce. But if they just want to have sex with their spouse just for the sake of it, and not to make a baby, they are a disgusting pervert. Sex addicts shouldn't even be married, it's already guaranteed they'll commit adultery.

 @5BP37LBfrom Maine  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8ZRCRS9 from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @5BPWQDHfrom California  answered…5yrs5Y

Who decides whether it is rape? If there is unassailable evidence that it is rape (e.g., unaltered video showing intent and action), only then should it be treated as rape.

 @9RHK5N6Alliance from New York  commented…11mos11MO

My brother in Christ, how many people are dumb enough to be filming themselves raping someone? Are you actually dense enough to believe there’s video proof of rape in every single rape instance?

I suppose the answer to the latter question is yes. You are dumb enough to believe that.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

Yes

 @9HP3GTZ from North Dakota  disagreed…1yr1Y

I think marital rape is different because you are married and most likely have sexual relations with each other and is different than nonmarital non consented sex.

 @9TQP76T from Texas  commented…9mos9MO

How is it different?

How is marital rape different from non-marital rape (because that's what the word is. 'Non consenting sex' is just rape. If we're going to talk about it, we should use the proper vocabulary instead of trying to make the crimes the perpetrator is committing sound 'less serious')? I'm genuinely curious as to what led you to this conclusion.

 @8992J59 from Illinois  agreed…9mos9MO

 @9LVS53HRepublicanagreed…1yr1Y

Rape is rape, no matter if it wasn't severe or not, it was still rape. So it should be under severe violence.

 @9KM6ZWF from Washington  disagreed…1yr1Y

Martial Rape and Non-Martial Rape should be punished differently because people can lie about Rape, profit off of the lawsuits, and make the other persons life more miserable. However, this doesn’t mean that Martial Rape doesn’t happen. I think that someone who files for martial rape should have at least a bit of evidence of such a thing happening before they start the lawsuit

 @9ZGRXQV from Minnesota  disagreed…7mos7MO

Often, in nasty divorces and court proceedings, we see embellishments of the truth for personal gain (custody of children, money, etc). I believe increasing the severity of this charge would add another tool to the war chest of ex-partner’s in court. Furthermore, what is the definition? What if the partner didn’t verbalize their dissent for sex as it was being initiated? Faster divorce court proceedings, access to women’s shelters, and adequately enforced restraining orders may better address this concern.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

Yes, and consentual sex with a spouse under the age of 18 should be classified as statutory rape

 @9F9TFJY from Pennsylvania  agreed…2yrs2Y

I think it depends on the age. If y'all are both the same age or at least a year difference, with consent it shouldn't be punishable until it's actual rape. If I am 18 and my 17 year old girlfriend gave me consent to have sex with her is shouldn't have to spend time in jail. But if someone was 18 having sex with someone 13-15 then yes, that's statutory rape.

 @9GYX2F6 from Florida  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I think it depends on the age. If y'all are both the same age or at least a year difference, with consent it shouldn't be punishable until it's actual rape. If I am 18 and my 17 year old girlfriend gave me consent to have sex with her is shouldn't have to spend time in jail. But if someone was 18 having sex with someone 13-15 then yes, that's statutory rape.

 @9M5MZWTWomen’s Equality from Texas  disagreed…1yr1Y

Yes the law criminalizes all forms of rape of men or women, including spousal rape, but unlike other rapes is not a “public crime”.

 @9FS9D4Q  from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

US doesn’t have to allow immigrants with child brides. It is our country & immigrants need to follow our laws or stay home.

 @992L37C from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CFSCL7  from North Carolina  commented…2yrs2Y

Yes it should be punished the same. Consensual sex with a spouse under 18 should not be statutory rape though.

 @DemocraticDelineatorRepublican from Oklahoma  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I understand your perspective, but I believe that consensual sex with a spouse under the age of 18 should be considered statutory rape. This is because individuals below the age of 18 are not yet considered to be adults and may not fully understand the consequences of their actions. For example, in certain states, the age of consent is 16, while the legal age for marriage is 18. This discrepancy could be used to exploit and manipulate young individuals into engaging in sexual activities that they might not be ready for. What do you think about this argument? Can you provide a counterargument or solution to address the potential issues related to the age of consent and marriage laws?

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

Anyone who has gone through puberty (which is usually well before they're 18, such as early teens) should have the right to decide whether or not they want to have sex. As wrong as it is, it is not right for the government to stop it, that would be extreme government overreach. Sex with someone before puberty is a big no-no though.

 @58ZG4RDfrom Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

No because some spouse's use this excuse to trap there other spouse as a form of blackmail,or do it in spite or revenge.

 @9RHK5N6Alliance from New York  commented…11mos11MO

How often is that happening vs. how often is marital rape happening? Why are you more concerned with someone being blackmailed than someone being actually raped? Only rapists think like that…

 @59C74F4from South Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

No, marriage provides legal subordination for a spouse to have sex with the other spouse

 @592MYPCfrom South Carolina  answered…5yrs5Y

 @592V4X7from Georgia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, classify it as domestic violence and decriminalize consentual sex with a spouse under the age of 18

 @8WDCHBN from Michigan  disagreed…4yrs4Y

decriminalize consentual sex with a spouse under the age of 18

Does that mean decriminalize pedophilia, like 40&16 years old? Or decriminalize 17&18 years old?

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

a 16 year old most likely has gone through puberty, therefore it wouldn't be pedophilia. How is 17&18 year old people having sex with each other pedophilia?

 @996RSPZ from Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

That's sort of the issue with grey areas like this; If the court rules in favor of one decision or the other, it stands that similar decisions will result in the same. I agree with the above stance, however, and despite the risk of a large age gap going unchecked, it would probably minimize scrutiny to couples who don't need it.

 @585W43RLibertarianfrom Texas  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, just because two adults are married doesn't mean they automatically consent towards any sexual activity at any time of the day. If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, and eats like a duck, it's a duck.

  @Dr-Michael-Rectenwald  from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

The burden of proof of said rape would be on the alleged victim because marriage includes sexual access.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Marriage does NOT include "sexual access", you absolutely still need the consent of your partner regardless of whether you're married or not. It sounds like you just view marriage as a contract of ownership, which is incredibly disturbing and is exactly why issues like this exist.

 @933J6CL from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

I suppose I’d say no in most cases, as one of the primary attributes of marriage has historically and socially been about sexual consent. I’d say in the instance where the spouses are separated or one has filed for divorce, one of them is clearly trying to escape the marriage contract. These circumstances should be classified as rape.

 @9KXYK5K from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

No, there's a contract that is signed that essentially says you will love and fulfill the needs of your spouse.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  disagreed…8mos8MO

 @9M7RP8T from South Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

I honestly don't see how it's rape. You're married and sex is part of marriage. I don't think coaxing someone who's not in the mood is "rape". That word is thrown around much too casually these days to the detriment of victims of actual rape.

  @JonBSimConstitutionfrom Kentucky  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it should be classified as domestic violence

Yes, it's bad.

Why would a domestic abuse charge be insufficient?

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

I don't know why a domestic abuse charge would be a level down from non-marital rape charge. Domestic violence is it's own category, but it should still be punished as severely as any other violence charge

  @top_mastiffRepublican  from Connecticut  answered…8mos8MO

No, it should be classified as domestic violence

Engaged Social Issues Engaged Marital Rape

It's not rape, it's domestic violence, and should be treated seriously but it's different than rape.

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  commented…3mos3MO

Treated differently - yes. Treated less severely - not if there is undeniable evidence.

 @9T9CVJPRepublican from Illinois  answered…9mos9MO

i feel like you would have to look into the case a little bit more then just letting omeone say something and get away with it and the other people go to jail

 @9FHYJNNRepublican from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FH3Q39Constitutionanswered…2yrs2Y

if they rape someone they should be sent to jail and the inmates will deal with them

  @TheHillbillyLordRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…3mos3MO

What do you mean "let the inmates deal with them"? Are you saying you think if someone commits a crime, inmates should be allowed to commit the crime onto them?

 @9K739LF from Kansas  answered…1yr1Y

I believe it should be punished more, since yes you may be married but that doesn’t give the right to force yourself upon your spouse

 @9BMYW55Progressive from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

No, if you married someone you better put up with their needs. If domestic violence is involved, that's another issue.

  @Renaldo-MoonGreen  from Pennsylvania  commented…8mos8MO

 @8FXMSDHLibertarian from Indiana  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes but only if it was a violent rape or and STD was passed to her because rape is defined as nonconsensual. If a wife wasn't physically hurt or given an std it's not as big of a deal.

 @8WDCHBN from Michigan  disagreed…4yrs4Y

Is the woman's trauma not a big deal? She can be mentally effected without being physically surt.

 @8GC9YC8 from Connecticut  answered…5yrs5Y

 @945G4NTRepublican from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

This might be a controversial answer, but there are different types of rape. There are nonviolent and violent. If a couple is in bed, the husband performs an act over slight protest while the wife is not fully awake. Is it considered "rape" if she is angry with him for it in the morning? That happens in marriages sometimes between a husband and wife. If it is an obvious violent sexual assault/rape, then, yes. It should certainly be as severely punished as a nonmarital offense. Every situation is different.

 @98QT4PX from California  answered…2yrs2Y

While it shouldn't be categorized as rape, it shouldn't be swept under the rug, and from how I see it, it should be charged as Domestic Violence.

While marriage provides legal rights for a spouse to have sexual intercourse with their spouse, in the end it all comes down to consent, and willingness to do so.

If one does not want to have sex, then they should be allowed to have that right to reject sexual intercourse if they do not want it. It is a consensual decision made by both partners and should be respected.

 @98W4MGVRepublican from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but it should still be punished especially if the victim is very affected.

  @93K7TKKIndependent from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

Rape is an abusive situation, it involves force, beatings, possibly weapons. And this would fall under domestic violence, when mental and physical abuse is involved. So I think this would be classified as domestic rape. 2 different types of rape. A non domestic rape victim, rarely knows the victim, and therefore no trust involved.

 @96XRMD7 from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it should be classified as domestic violence and consentual sex with a spouse under the age of 18 should be classified as statutory rape

 Deletedanswered…3yrs3Y

 @95M3DZJ from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and consentual sex with a spouse under the age of 16 should be classified as statutory rape

 @94HVDNG from Montana  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes if it can be proven without a doubt that it was rape and not just a pissed of spouse

OSZAR »